New · browser-use Ecosystem · Trending on GitHub

Video-Use — AI Video Editing Through Browser Automation

browser-use just launched video-use: an AI agent that edits video by controlling a browser. Same architecture as browser-use — LLM + Playwright — but applied to video editing workflows instead of web scraping. If browser-use is "give an AI a browser and it browses," video-use is "give an AI a browser and it edits your video."

What Is Video-Use

video-use is the second project in the browser-use ecosystem, after the core browser-use framework (100K+ stars). It applies the same AI-agent-via-browser pattern to video editing:

  • browser-use: LLM controls a browser → scrapes, clicks, fills forms, extracts data
  • video-use: LLM controls a browser-based video editor → imports clips, applies cuts, adds transitions, renders output

The key insight: video editing UIs (like browser-based editors) are just DOM trees + Canvas. The same agent architecture that navigates web pages can navigate video timelines. No special video processing API needed — the agent uses the editor's UI exactly like a human would.

Componentbrowser-usevideo-use
Agent targetAny website / web appBrowser-based video editor
LLM roleDecide which element to interact withDecide which edit operation to perform
Browser enginePlaywright (Chromium)Playwright (Chromium)
OutputScraped data, filled forms, screenshotsEdited video file (mp4, webm)
Action spaceClick, type, scroll, navigateCut, trim, transition, text overlay, render
State representationDOM tree + accessibility tree + screenshotTimeline state + canvas preview + edit history

Installation

video-use extends browser-use. If you already have browser-use running, adding video-use is one pip install.

# Prerequisites: browser-use installed and working
pip install browser-use

# Install video-use
pip install video-use

# Install Playwright browsers (if not already done)
playwright install chromium

# Verify
python -c "from video_use import VideoAgent; print('ready')"
# → ready

Quick Start: First AI Video Edit

This example takes a raw clip, trims the first 5 seconds, adds a title card, and renders.

from video_use import VideoAgent
from browser_use import ChatOpenAI

# Initialize the video editing agent
agent = VideoAgent(
    llm=ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-5.5"),
    editor_url="https://editor.example.com",  # browser-based video editor
    headless=False  # Set True for production
)

# Describe what you want — the agent figures out the UI
result = await agent.run("""
    Take input.mp4 and:
    1. Trim the first 5 seconds (black intro)
    2. Add a title card at 0:00: "My Video"
    3. Add a fade transition at 0:05
    4. Export as output.mp4 at 1080p
""")

print(f"Video saved: {result.output_path}")
print(f"Edit steps: {len(result.steps)}")
# → Video saved: output.mp4
# → Edit steps: 12

The agent figures out which buttons to click, what values to enter, and how to navigate the editor's UI. The LLM translates your natural-language instructions into a sequence of browser actions.

Why Browser Automation for Video Editing

This approach solves three problems that traditional video processing APIs (FFmpeg, MoviePy) don't:

1. No API Learning Curve

FFmpeg has 300+ flags. MoviePy requires Python compositing knowledge. video-use lets you describe edits in English and the agent translates to UI actions. Same workflow as browser-use: you don't write DOM selectors, you say "click the login button."

2. Visual Feedback Loop

The agent sees the video preview (via screenshots). If a cut is wrong, it sees the visual result and corrects — unlike a blind FFmpeg command that only gives you the final output.

3. Editor-Agnostic

video-use doesn't hardcode any specific editor's API. Point it at any browser-based video editor and it adapts. This means you can use professional editors (Adobe Premiere web, Kapwing, Canva video) without writing platform-specific integration code.

Batch Video Processing

Where video-use shines: processing many videos with the same edit pattern. Think YouTube highlight clips, TikTok reformatting, or tutorial intro/outro insertion.

import asyncio
from video_use import VideoAgent, BatchProcessor

# Process 50 videos with the same edit template
template = """
    1. Cut silence at start and end
    2. Add intro.mp4 at 0:00
    3. Add "Subscribe" text overlay at bottom-right, last 10 seconds
    4. Add outro.mp4 at end
    5. Export as {name}_edited.mp4 at 1080p
"""

async def process_batch():
    processor = BatchProcessor(
        agent=VideoAgent(llm=ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-5.5")),
        max_concurrent=4,  # 4 parallel browser instances
        input_dir="./raw_clips",
        output_dir="./edited"
    )

    results = await processor.run(template, glob="*.mp4")
    print(f"Processed: {results.completed}/{results.total}")
    print(f"Failed: {results.failed}")
    print(f"Avg time per video: {results.avg_time_seconds:.1f}s")
    # → Processed: 48/50
    # → Failed: 2 (unsupported codec in input)
    # → Avg time per video: 47.3s

asyncio.run(process_batch())

Production Considerations

video-use is new (released July 2026). Before deploying to production, understand the trade-offs:

ConcernStatusMitigation
ReliabilityEarly stageRun with headless=True, add retry logic (agent sometimes misclicks)
SpeedGood for asyncBatchProcessor parallelizes well. 4 concurrent = ~4× throughput
Editor dependencyFragileEditor UI changes break the agent. Pin a specific editor version or self-host
CostPredictableLLM token cost per video edit: ~5K-15K tokens. At GPT-5.5 pricing, ~$0.02-0.05/edit
Video qualityEditor-dependentQuality is whatever the underlying editor produces. Not a video-use limitation

The Browser-Use Ecosystem Is Expanding

video-use is the second standalone project in the browser-use ecosystem. The pattern is clear:

  • browser-use (core): General-purpose browser automation agent
  • video-use (new): Video editing via browser automation
  • Future: Expect more domain-specific agents (audio-use? design-use?) as the ecosystem matures

Each new project reduces the platform risk of browser-use. When there's only one project, it's a bet on a single tool. With video-use, it's becoming a pattern — browser automation as the universal interface for AI agents.

Running Video-Use? The Manual Covers the Infrastructure.

video-use runs on the same Docker + Playwright stack as browser-use. The Production Manual covers headless Chromium configuration, anti-detection, session management, and batch queue architecture — everything you need to run browser-use (and video-use) at scale.

Get the Production Manual — $39

30-day money-back guarantee. Covers Docker, headless Chromium, anti-detection, batch queues, and troubleshooting.

Last updated: July 2, 2026 · video-use released July 2026

FAQ

Is video-use free and open source?

video-use is part of the browser-use ecosystem on GitHub. Check the official repo for license details. The ecosystem uses MIT/Apache licensing — same permissive terms as browser-use itself.

Which video editors does video-use support?

video-use is editor-agnostic. It controls any browser-based video editor through Playwright — the agent navigates the editor's DOM, not a specific API. This means it works with browser-based editors like Kapwing, Canva's video editor, and web-based Adobe Premiere. If the editor runs in a browser, video-use can control it.

Does video-use edit videos locally or in the cloud?

Both. video-use runs on your machine (or your Docker container) and controls a browser. The browser points at whatever video editor you configure — a self-hosted browser editor for fully local processing, or a cloud editor. The video files are handled by the underlying editor, not by video-use directly.

Is video-use production-ready for batch processing?

video-use was released July 2026 — it's very new. The BatchProcessor works (handles concurrent browser instances), but reliability is early-stage. For non-critical batch processing (marketing clips, tutorial intros), it's usable today. For customer-facing production video pipelines, wait 1-2 months for stability improvements. The key fragility: editor UI changes can break the agent.

How does video-use handle errors during editing?

The agent uses visual feedback — it takes screenshots of the editor UI and the LLM validates whether the edit looks correct. If an edit fails (e.g., a cut at the wrong timestamp), the agent retries. However, there's no formal error recovery protocol yet. For batch processing, failed videos are reported in results.failed and you can re-run them individually.

What's the difference between video-use and browser-use?

browser-use is the general-purpose framework: give an LLM a browser, it browses/scrapes/fills forms. video-use applies the same architecture to a specific domain: video editing. The LLM sees the video editor UI through Playwright, decides what buttons to click, and performs edits. Same agent loop, same Playwright engine, different action space (cut/trim/transition vs click/type/navigate).